Berean Bible Church

Facts about the Bible

Lesson VII

More about Interpretation - I

May 17, 2009

 

 

I   I have learned that Bible history is linked history

This is not difficult to prove. When one sees this fact one learns that to reject part is to reject all.  To accept part is to accept all.  There is no middle ground.

Example: one

Genesis 50:26  in Egypt

Exodus 1:1  the verse does not make sense without the book of Genesis

Leviticus 1:1 begins with the word “and” linked with what has gone before

Numbers 1:1  what a link

One cannot understand Numbers without Leviticus, Leviticus without Exodus nor Exodus without Genesis.(This can be followed through all Bible history))

Example two

The record of “Israel’s coming out of Egypt” is found through out Scripture from

Exodus 14:30-31 to Hebrews 8:9.

From Exodus to the end of Deuteronomy it is referred to 90 times. In Joshua 10 times, Judges 9 times, 1 Samuel 9 times, 2 Samuel 2 times, 1 Kings 5 times, 2 Kings 2 times,1 Chronicles 2 times, 2 Chronicles to chapter 8, 3 times.  (This is where I am in my daily Bible reading)  See also Psalm 106:7-11

The point is this:  if one cannot believe the record in Exodus one cannot really believe the rest of the Bible.

 

II  I have learned that Bible history is literal history

1 Corinthians 10:1-11  these things happened

Luke 2:1-7  is this not literal history?

John 5:46-47  to deny one is to deny the other

A young preacher said to me in the late 1940’s:  “we know that Moses never wrote a letter to his grandmother. We spent six months in seminary discovering who wrote  Genesis

            Exodus 24:4  Moses wrote

            Deuteronomy 27:8   Moses wrote

            Deuteronomy 31: 9,19,22,24,

            I have learned that history must be literal or it ceases to be history.

 

III  I have learned that Bible history is really about life

In the Bible we have “case-histories” of Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, David, Job. All the kings, the priests and the prophets in the Old Testament

James 5:17  all were “men of like passions”

Strange, that as they were then men are much the same now.  Evolution does not seem to fit the records of human history!